
This is a sample article featured in the January 2006 issue of Quadrant
For sample pages from previous issues click here
|
PASTORS OR MISSION LEADERS? Psychological type and models of Christian leadership |
Carl Jung’s theory of psychological type is proving to be a very useful tool in
understanding and interpreting strengths and weaknesses in church life. The
helps in understanding congregations and worship patterns, as well as clergy and
leadership styles.1
Jung’s theory of psychological type is based on four
contrasting opposites. The first contrast is between introversion (I) and
extraversion (E). The introvert draws energy from the inner world, while the
extravert draws energy from the outer world. The extravert is at home with
people and leads from the front. The introvert is at home in his or her own
space and leads from within.
The second contrast is between sensing (S) and intuition (N).
The senser is more comfortable with facts and details, while the intuitive is
more comfortable with ideas and possibilities. The senser likes stability. The
intuitive likes changes.
The third contrast is between thinking (T) and feeling (F).
The thinker is an organisation person, while the feeler is a people person. The
thinker is inspired by strategy. The feeler is inspired by harmony.
The fourth contrast is between judging (J) and perceiving
(P). The judger is organised and disciplined, while the perceiver is flexible
and spontaneous. The judger likes working in organisations. The perceiver
prefers to challenge organisations.
Clergy types - ISFJs
In a study of 427 clergymen in the Church in Wales, Francis, Payne and Jones2
discovered that their preferred type was introversion, sensing, feeling and
judging (ISFJ). The personality profile helps to characterise and to explain the
model of Christian leadership valued and implemented by many parish clergy
within the Church in Wales.
First and foremost, church members and parishioners will be
pastored and nurtured with care and sensitivity. Leadership is there to promote
human wellbeing rather than to implement strategy or develop slick
organisational skills. Feeling dominates over thinking.
Second, leadership will focus on working with individuals or
small groups rather than with large groups. A quiet family atmosphere will
emerge in preference to outreach and contact with strangers. Introversion
dominates over extraversion.
This kind of leadership excels in a highly feminised
environment which so well describes many local churches where women generally
outnumber men two to one. But this is also an environment which puzzles and may
even alienate many men who are used to a very different type of leadership in
the work-place. There in the work-place the successful manager so often presents
the mirror image of the personality profile of the clergymen. In that
environment extraversion and thinking reign supreme.
The finding that men engaged in pastoral ministry tend to
prefer feeling over thinking is not confined to the one study among Anglican
clergy in Wales. For example, MacDaid, McCaulley and Kainz3, drawing on a sample
of 1,298 Roman Catholic priests in the United States of America found that 80%
preferred feeling and 20% preferred thinking. Oswald and Kroeger4, using a
sample of 1,247 male clergy from a range of denominations in the United States
of America found that 68% preferred feeling and 32% preferred thinking.
Missionary trainee types - ESTJs
So what happens to the extraverted thinking men called to
leadership within the Christian community? If they do not go into local church
ministry, where do they go? Their location has been identified in a new study by
Craig, Horsfall and Francis5 into the psychological type profile of 92 male
evangelical missionary personnel training in England. This time the preferred
type emerged as extraversion, sensing, thinking and judging (ESTJ). These data
suggest that the demands of the mission field may call out very different
qualities of leadership from the demands of parish ministry.
Implications
At its most basic Jungian psychological type theory helps us
to understand that the personality profile of the people recruited into
Christian ministry goes a long way to shaping the model of Christian leadership
we can hope to see in our local churches, in para-church organisations and in
the mission field.
Once, however, ministry in the United Kingdom becomes
reconceptualised in terms of growing new churches and developing new para-church
initiatives (rather than pastoring ever dwindling, aging and feminised
congregations), then the leadership qualities prized by the churches’ selection
criteria may also need to be revisited.

Rev Prof Leslie J Francis
Director, Welsh National Centre for Religious Education and Professor of
Practical Theology, University of Wales, Bangor
Notes
1 For an up-to-date discussion see L.J. Francis, Faith and Psychology, London,
Darton, Longman and Todd, 2005.
2 L.J. Francis, V.J. Payne and S.H. Jones, Psychological types of male Anglican
clergy in Wales, Journal of Psychological Type, 56, 19-23, 2001.
3 G.P. Macdaid, M.H. McCaulley and R.I. Kainz, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator:
atlas of type tables, Gainesville, Florida, Centre for Application of
Psychological Type Inc, 1986.
4 R.M. Oswald and O. Kroeger, Personality Type and Religious Leadership,
Washington, DC, The Alban Institute, 1988.
5 C.L. Craig, T Horsfall and L.J. Francis, Psychological types of male
evangelical missionary personnel training in England: a role for thinking type
men? Pastoral Psychology, 53, 475-482, 2005.
Psychological type of male church leaders by group
I or E S or N
T or F J or P
% % % %
% % % %
________________________________________________________________________
Church in Wales (N= 427)
59 41 57 43
31 69 68 32
Missionary personnel (N = 92) 45 55
65 35 70
30 75 25
________________________________________________________________________
For a full index of all articles published January 2000 - November 2003
Click Here
Sample Pages from previous issues of Quadrant
| September 2004 | November 2004 | January 2005 | May 2005 |
| July 2005 | September 2005 |