
This is a sample article featured in the May 2006 issue of Quadrant
For sample pages from previous issues click here
|
CAN THE CHURCH BE TIPPED INTO GROWTH? |
Over the last forty years the Christian church in the UK has
faced unremitting decline, with most denominations seeing their attendance more
than halved. People are now seriously asking the question, which, if any, of the
mainstream denominations will survive the next forty years? Considering that the
number of church buildings has not declined in step with attendance, the
immediate future of churches with few members and no minister, struggling
towards extinction, appears ominous. What can help avoid this fate?
Mathematical Modelling
Mathematics can’t save a church from extinction but it can give insights into
mechanisms of church growth and indicate problem areas. Using ideas from the
modelling of epidemics, and computer simulation, principles can be developed
that govern growth and decline.
Churches grow because Christians spread the gospel and see unbelievers
converted. Such Christians, the enthusiasts, act like the carrier of a disease
(a healthy one in this case!), which they pass on to unbelievers, seeing them
come to faith in Jesus Christ. Although only a minority of Christians are such
enthusiasts the ability of the church to grow depends critically on how well
such enthusiasts reproduce themselves. That is, how many converts they bring
into the church who themselves become enthusiasts. This is their reproduction
potential.
Tipping Points
If a church’s reproduction potential falls below a threshold, the church heads
for extinction. This extinction tipping point is set by the losses from the
church. If the reproduction potential exceeds a higher threshold, not only will
the church survive, but it will see an increase in the number of enthusiasts and
rapid growth, similar to that of a revival. This is the revival growth tipping
point.
Current situation
Currently the Methodists and URC, are well below the extinction tipping point.
They are not producing enough enthusiasts to survive, and even if their losses
were reduced extinction will be reached well before the middle of this century.
The Church of England and Roman Catholic Church are also below this extinction
point but could survive if losses were substantially reduced. By contrast the
New Church streams are above the revival growth tipping point, and attendance
will exceed that of the Church of England by 2025 if current patterns are
continued.
Computer simulations indicate that the losses from all these churches are very
similar; the difference lies in their reproduction potentials. The growing
churches are producing enthusiasts! This suggests that generating enthusiasts
would be a better strategy than stemming losses if a church were to be tipped
into growth
An Illustration
Consider attendance in the Church of England. Curve 1 in figure 1 shows its
decline if things remain the same. By comparison, halving the losses from 2006
sees the church survive, although without any recovery (curve 2). The tipping
point for extinction has been avoided, but the one for revival growth is still
far off. If instead, the Church of England could produce enthusiasts as well as
the New Churches, it starts growing again (curve 3), it is now tipped into
revival growth. Generating enthusiasts has the most dramatic effect in the long
term.

A cautionary note is needed here; there is a significant delay in the growth
starting. It is 2020 before the church starts to grow again, and 2030 before it
is back to current levels; such is the inertia in the system. Clearly the
resource implications of decline need to be faced even if the church is tipped
into growth and revival comes.
Renewal & Critical Mass
Increasing the reproduction potential has a drawback, as it requires more
conversions per enthusiast, not easy in a society unimpressed with Christianity.
However an alternative source of enthusiasts can be achieved by “re-infecting”
existing believers with new life. These renewed believers swell the pool of
enthusiasts in the church, making new converts and renewing Christians.
Most revivals start by the renewal of church people first. Initially the main
source of enthusiasts is existing believers, but as the number of enthusiasts
grows a critical mass is reached and church growth explodes. The main source of
enthusiasts is now the new converts. This pattern is often seen on Alpha
courses.
For example, figure 2 shows a church of 100 people in 1980 following similar
decline to the Church of England (curve 1). It declines to 20 by 2050.
Increasing renewal in 2006 has little effect on growth for around 30 years, but
once the critical mass of enthusiasts is reached the growth is dramatic. The
last 350 are added in less than 10 years!

Renewal not evangelism is the key to church growth, but patience is needed as
its effects are delayed. It may be that the current growth in the New Churches,
and those related to the Alpha course, is the result of the renewal of the
1970’s working through. If growth is to be sustained then that renewal would
need to be pursued even more vigorously now.

For a full index of all articles published January 2000 - November 2003
Click Here
Sample Pages from previous issues of Quadrant
| September 2004 | November 2004 | January 2005 | May 2005 |
| July 2005 | September 2005 | January 2006 | March 2006 |