
This is a sample article featured in the November 2004 issue of Quadrant
For sample pages from previous issues click here
|
THE RESPONSIBILITY GAP |
Who cares, and for whom in Britain today? That is the subject of the latest research commissioned by the Salvation Army from the Henley Centre. There are several changes happening in society which affect our interest in, or ability to care.
Time and money
British people are overall wealthier and more mobile, but also busier than ever before:
disposable incomes were on average 2˝ times greater in 2003 than they were in 1979
the top 10% of the population accounted for 20% of the national income in 1979 but it is predicted to be 30% in 2010, while the bottom 10% accounted for 4.4% of the national income in 1979 dropping to 3% in 2010
as a nation we travelled 720 billion passenger kilometres in 1999 compared with 218 billion in 1952
nearly half the British population moved house during the 1990s
British adults work the longest hours in Europe, 57% saying their workload has increased in the past year
an increasing proportion of women are in employment, especially those in the age groups most likely to have dependent children, as this chart shows:
Women in employment by age group, 1971 and 2006
| 1971 | 2006 | |
| 25-34 | 45 | 78 |
| 34-44 | 60 | 85 |
| 45-54 | 62 | 81 |
People have more money, but less time. They therefore have less time to care, but are more likely to be able to afford to buy care - if it is available. They are more mobile and tend to choose the community they belong to according to their interests rather than belonging to the community where they live. When asked about what they have in common with other people, the highest response was 69% for partner/spouse, but people with the same interests and hobbies came at 60% compared with only 23% for neighbours.
Changing priorities
If people marry (rather than cohabit) they do so later and the average age is now 31 for men and 29 for women. Increasing divorce rates and couples having children at an older age all add up to changing patterns of family life and thus also of care provided within families. People’s views of who is to blame for society’s ills have shifted. When asked why people live in need 25% answered “Because of laziness of lack of will power” in 2000 compared with 16% in 1994 but the percentage who thought it was “Because of injustice in our society” dropped from 32% to 23% in the same period.
Caring
In 1999 63% of people thought people were less caring than 10 years previously. When asked why, every option had increased considerably as this chart shows:
Why people are less caring
| 1989 | 1999 | |
| Lack of discipline from parents | 24 | 38 |
| Decline in moral values | 17 | 35 |
| Attitudes of young people | 22 | 31 |
| Growth in materialism | 14 | 28 |
| Break-up of family life | 17 | 28 |
Responsibility for the elderly is one key area. One in five (21%) don’t want to care for elderly relatives, but a third (34%) are worried that there will be no one to look after them when they get old. This is aggravated by the fact that the number of places in care homes for the elderly dropped by 6,700 between 1998 and 2001, the majority of these in the public sector.
The increase in the number of women in employment means more child care places are needed. For disadvantaged families there are only 43,000 subsidised child care places for 600,000 children under the age of three living in poverty.
The number of people claiming disability allowance doubled in the 1990s from 1.7 million in 1991 to 3.5 million in 2000. The number of people in England, Scotland and Wales seeking treatment for their drug use increased 7% from 1999 to 2000 and was 45% more than in 1995, while in 1997 10,000 people received help for alcohol misuse every day.
Sources of care
There are four sources of care: individuals, government, charities and private sector. Most people now tend to believe that responsibility for those in need outside their immediate family lies primarily with the government. However, they are much more likely to trust charities than the government, and 79% of the general public thinks charities have to fund services which should be provided by the government. Volunteering increased in the 1980s but declined slightly in the 1990s mainly because of the increase in single parents and in women working outside the home. Private sector provision is assisted by schemes such as Tesco’s Computers for Schools programme.
Christian response
The Salvation Army is working hard to meet some of the gaps in caring provision, and so are many other local churches and denominations. 65% of churches have parents and toddlers groups, 64% have something for the elderly, 17% offer counselling and 16% bereavement support. The article on youth work in this edition of Quadrant shows how much is being done for young people. But there is always scope for more, especially as a way of demonstrating the love of God to those in need in our communities.
Sources: The Responsibility Gap, The Henley Centre for the Salvation Army, 2004; Leadership, Vision & Growing Churches, Christian Research, 2003; article in Charities Management, Winder 2003/New Year 2004.
For a full index of all articles published January 2000 - November 2003
Click Here
Sample Pages from previous issues of Quadrant
| September 2004 |